<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: GiR&#8217;s guide to blood sugar</title>
	<atom:link href="http://plasticpancreas.wordpress.com/2008/05/08/girs-guide-to-blood-sugar/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://plasticpancreas.wordpress.com/2008/05/08/girs-guide-to-blood-sugar/</link>
	<description>The adventures of Amalas, Lucy, and Charlie</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 22:18:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Amalas</title>
		<link>http://plasticpancreas.wordpress.com/2008/05/08/girs-guide-to-blood-sugar/#comment-994</link>
		<dc:creator>Amalas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 13:25:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://plasticpancreas.wordpress.com/?p=189#comment-994</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t actually have my sensors yet, they are just ordered.  The suspense is killing me!!!

Your thinking about the Keynote is interesting, but I&#039;m not sure it&#039;s accurate.  I&#039;ve been using the Keynote along with my Flash (and now I&#039;ve switched over to the Lite), and the Keynote doesn&#039;t always give higher numbers.  Like I said in &lt;a href=&quot;http://plasticpancreas.wordpress.com/2008/05/08/testing-out-the-keynote/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this post&lt;/a&gt;, they are more &quot;centered&quot;.  Often when I am high(er), the Keynote actually gives lower values.

Of course, I am comparing the Keynote to the Freestyle products, while you are comparing the Keynote to the One Touch products, so maybe that is where the difference it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t actually have my sensors yet, they are just ordered.  The suspense is killing me!!!</p>
<p>Your thinking about the Keynote is interesting, but I&#8217;m not sure it&#8217;s accurate.  I&#8217;ve been using the Keynote along with my Flash (and now I&#8217;ve switched over to the Lite), and the Keynote doesn&#8217;t always give higher numbers.  Like I said in <a href="http://plasticpancreas.wordpress.com/2008/05/08/testing-out-the-keynote/" rel="nofollow">this post</a>, they are more &#8220;centered&#8221;.  Often when I am high(er), the Keynote actually gives lower values.</p>
<p>Of course, I am comparing the Keynote to the Freestyle products, while you are comparing the Keynote to the One Touch products, so maybe that is where the difference it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bernard Farrell</title>
		<link>http://plasticpancreas.wordpress.com/2008/05/08/girs-guide-to-blood-sugar/#comment-993</link>
		<dc:creator>Bernard Farrell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 12:47:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://plasticpancreas.wordpress.com/?p=189#comment-993</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve used the Keynote as a second meter for the last year or so. Because of my Dexcom I&#039;m forced to use the OneTouch Ultra as my primary. The Keynote consistently gives me higher results than the OneTouch.

Looking at their test results, I&#039;m more inclined to accept the Keynote values. Here&#039;s my thinking (could be flawed). If you&#039;re putting a meter out that&#039;s got a low accuracy level you&#039;d want it to report the blood sugar towards the low end of what might be the real number. If your blood sugar is really 100 and the meter says it&#039;s 85 that&#039;s OK. But if the meter said it was 120, you might over correct and drop low. My guess is that meter companies adjust the meters that way.

Congrats on the Dexcom. How are the sensors going for you? I usually get about 10 days out of each one on average. Right now the one I&#039;m wearing is 11 days old, but the adhesive is looking pretty ratty. :-)

Have you tried the software out yet? It&#039;s &lt;b&gt;very&lt;/b&gt; informative. Especially the hourly view over a week or more. You can see which times of day need fixing up based on the spread of readings. All good stuff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve used the Keynote as a second meter for the last year or so. Because of my Dexcom I&#8217;m forced to use the OneTouch Ultra as my primary. The Keynote consistently gives me higher results than the OneTouch.</p>
<p>Looking at their test results, I&#8217;m more inclined to accept the Keynote values. Here&#8217;s my thinking (could be flawed). If you&#8217;re putting a meter out that&#8217;s got a low accuracy level you&#8217;d want it to report the blood sugar towards the low end of what might be the real number. If your blood sugar is really 100 and the meter says it&#8217;s 85 that&#8217;s OK. But if the meter said it was 120, you might over correct and drop low. My guess is that meter companies adjust the meters that way.</p>
<p>Congrats on the Dexcom. How are the sensors going for you? I usually get about 10 days out of each one on average. Right now the one I&#8217;m wearing is 11 days old, but the adhesive is looking pretty ratty. <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Have you tried the software out yet? It&#8217;s <b>very</b> informative. Especially the hourly view over a week or more. You can see which times of day need fixing up based on the spread of readings. All good stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kathy</title>
		<link>http://plasticpancreas.wordpress.com/2008/05/08/girs-guide-to-blood-sugar/#comment-973</link>
		<dc:creator>Kathy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 14:46:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://plasticpancreas.wordpress.com/?p=189#comment-973</guid>
		<description>Ha ha ha ha ha! Too true, especially about &quot;the whole universe&quot;! :)

Seriously, though, what is up with wide-ranging values across different meters? Ugh! I know how you feel. My piece o&#039;crap (TrueTrack Cheapie Model) can be 100 points different between hands. WTF?!?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ha ha ha ha ha! Too true, especially about &#8220;the whole universe&#8221;! <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Seriously, though, what is up with wide-ranging values across different meters? Ugh! I know how you feel. My piece o&#8217;crap (TrueTrack Cheapie Model) can be 100 points different between hands. WTF?!?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
